Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 1859/2022

Case between State Bank of India vs M/s Choice Garments regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Code No.
1859
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is State Bank of India, represented by its Chief Manager, who is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, M/s Choice Garments. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and legal notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with costs, and the defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,62,139/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.45% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,62,139/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Sixty Two thousand One hundred and Thirty Nine only) to the plaintiff with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with costs, and the defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,62,139/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.45% per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,62,139/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Sixty Two thousand One hundred and Thirty Nine only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.45% per annum for the principal amount from 06.09.2022 till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Chief Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Choice Garments
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application dated 20.05.2019, Letter of Arrangement dated 30.05.2019, Original Agreement of Loan-cum-hypothecation dated 30.05.2019, Original letter of Arrangement dated 24.06.2020, Supplemental Agreement of loan-cum-hypothecation dated 24.06.2020, Original Letter of Arrangement dated 23.06.2021, Supplemental Agreement of Loan-Cum-Hypothecation dated 23.06.2021, Copy of Advocate Notice dated 29.09.2022, Certified Copy of Statement of Accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Teresa Jaya Fernandez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,62,139/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Sixty Two thousand One hundred and Thirty Nine only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.45% per annum for the principal amount from 06.09.2022 till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the initial application for the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions of the loan arrangement on 30.05.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Agreement of Loan-cum-hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the formal agreement regarding the loan and hypothecation executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Letter of Arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document pertains to the loan arrangement related to the GECL loan taken on 24.06.2020.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Supplemental Agreement of Loan-cum-hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supplements the initial loan arrangement for the GECL loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Letter of Arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the loan arrangement taken on 23.06.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Supplemental Agreement of Loan-cum-hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supplements the loan agreement executed on 23.06.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the notice sent to the defendant regarding the loan defaults.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the financial transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 05/30/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won