Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.970/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Krishnadas N.V regarding Suit for realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Krishnadas N.V, for the recovery of a loan amount of ₹61,064/- due to non-payment. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to an ex-parte judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹61,064/- with 6% interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendant had not fulfilled their payment obligations under the loan agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendant had not fulfilled their payment obligations under the loan agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹61,064/- (Rupees Sixty-One Thousand and Sixty-Four only) is due from the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹61,064/- (Rupees Sixty-One Thousand and Sixty-Four only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the defendant and his assets. b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnadas N.V
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan application, Original arrangement letter, Original personal loan agreement, Standing instruction letter, Copy of the Account statement, Advocate’s notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arun Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Athira D.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ampady Rajkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Varun Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹61,064/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹61,064/- (Rupees Sixty-One Thousand and Sixty-Four only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented as evidence that the loan was applied for by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original arrangement letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms agreed upon for the loan between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original personal loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the formal agreement for the personal loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Standing instruction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter authorizes the bank to deduct EMIs from the defendant's salary account.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial transactions and outstanding balance on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advocate’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Krishnadas N.V regarding Suit for realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Krishnadas N.V regarding Suit for realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 02/22/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won