Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.297/2025

Case between Sreekumar T. vs Harilal V.S. regarding injunction relief

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt Sreelakshmi C.
Order Date
2025-02-15
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sreekumar T. filed a petition against Harilal V.S. seeking an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property. The court granted the injunction to protect the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant to ensure peaceful possession of the property until the next date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant to ensure peaceful possession of the property until the next date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff demonstrated that immediate action was necessary to protect their possession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekumar T.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harilal V.S.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B.C. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and building.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and building and not to destroy the boundaries, not to commit waste and from doing anything detrimental to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and building until 15/03/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreekumar T. vs Harilal V.S. regarding injunction relief
Case Code Year
Case between Sreekumar T. vs Harilal V.S. regarding injunction relief

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won