Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 440/2025

Case between Sreekala vs Sunitha C S Nair et al regarding injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sreekala as the plaintiff seeking an interim injunction against Sunitha C S Nair and Chandrika Devi S. The court granted an injunction to prevent the defendants from making any constructions on the property in question until further orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to the plaintiff, Sreekala, against the defendants, Sunitha C S Nair and Chandrika Devi S.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from making constructions.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to the plaintiff, Sreekala, against the defendants, Sunitha C S Nair and Chandrika Devi S.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from making any constructions in the plaint ‘A’ schedule property or from changing the nature and lie of the same until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekala
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha C S Nair
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrika Devi S
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun.I.Sreedhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Aravind.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jomi.J.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Arya.S.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from making any constructions in the plaint ‘A’ schedule property or from changing the nature and lie of the same until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreekala vs Sunitha C S Nair et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sreekala vs Sunitha C S Nair et al regarding injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won