Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.2213/2016

Case between Sreedevi.P.K et al vs Ambili.P.K et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sreedevi.P.K and Sarasa, filed a suit against the defendants Ambili.P.K and J. Sudhirenjan. The court ruled that the suit was dismissed as not pressed and the counter claim was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the suit to be dismissed as not pressed, and the counter claim was also dismissed for default as the defendants were not present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the suit to be dismissed as not pressed, and the counter claim was also dismissed for default as the defendants were not present.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. The defendants are neither present nor represented. Hence, the counter claim is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedevi.P.K
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarasa
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ambili.P.K
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
J. Sudhirenjan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
L. Mohanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. I.V. Vijayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vishnuraj.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The counter claim is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, the counter claim is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreedevi.P.K et al vs Ambili.P.K et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Sreedevi.P.K et al vs Ambili.P.K et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won