Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.14/2022

Case between Shobha et al vs Manju et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-18
Duration
approximately-3 years 0 days
Case Code No.
14
Case Closed
Tue, 02/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Shobha and Krishna Priya.S, filed a suit against the defendants, Manju, Sona, and Subhashini, regarding a compromise agreement. The court accepted the terms of the agreement and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both the plaintiffs and defendants, decreeing the suit in accordance with the compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both the plaintiffs and defendants, decreeing the suit in accordance with the compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of compromise agreement, I am satisfied that terms of agreement is lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shobha
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o Sathya Rajan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishna Priya.S
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o Sathya Rajan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manju
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o Sajeev (late)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sona
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o Sajeev (Late)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhashini
Party Age
68
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.G.Aravind
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Kulathoor Rahul.L.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vellarada Rethin.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by the plaintiffs and defendants.
Reference:
IA 8/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 02/18/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won