Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 662/2025

Case between Shinod A.J vs The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitor injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shinod A.J filed a petition for a permanent prohibitor injunction to prevent the defendants from taking physical possession of a vehicle he owns, financed by them. The defendants claim the plaintiff has defaulted on the loan agreement and can take possession as per the arbitration provisions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for injunction was allowed, preventing the defendants from taking physical possession of the vehicle except in accordance with due process of law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants, their agents and the persons acting under them from taking physical possession of the plaint schedule vehicle except in accordance with due process of law
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The petition for injunction was allowed, preventing the defendants from taking physical possession of the vehicle except in accordance with due process of law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff demonstrated a prima-facie case and balance of convenience in his favor.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff demonstrated a prima-facie case and balance of convenience in his favor.
Supporting Evidence
The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of plaint schedule vehicle... The defendants are not acting legally and the petitioner has not received any order authorizing the defendants to take physical possession of the vehicle.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The defendants, their agents and the persons acting under them from taking physical possession of the plaint schedule vehicle except in accordance with due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shinod A.J
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sundaram Finance Limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested copy of the registration certificate, Copy of the Policy Certificate, Copy of the license issued by the food safety and standards Authority of India, The latest bill for supplying the goods by Parle Biscuits Pvt Ltd.
Defendants Documents
Copy Loan Agreement, Copy of Award in Arbitration Case No. MCCI/SP/414 of 2023.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Thirumala P.K. Mani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B.Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from taking physical possession of the vehicle
Evidence:
The petition is allowed as follows: The defendants, their agents and the persons acting under them from taking physical possession of the plaint schedule vehicle except in accordance with due process of law.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves plaintiff's ownership of the vehicle
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Policy Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows insurance coverage of the vehicle owned by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Food Safety License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Validates the plaintiff's wife's business operations
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bill for Supply of Goods
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports plaintiff's operational status of the business associated with the vehicle
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Details the terms of the loan provided to the plaintiff for the vehicle
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Arbitration Award
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the amount owed by the plaintiff according to the arbitration proceedings
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shinod A.J vs The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitor injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shinod A.J vs The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitor injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Dr.Yamuna Prasad et al vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Preethi Paul vs Dr.Sheela.K.Pillai regarding injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Getthakumari vs Sivakumar.V et al regarding injunction against trespassing into property.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sasidharan.D vs Vijayalekshmi.P et al regarding injunction and property rights
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won