Case Summary
Sheltan Lopez filed an application against Margret Anto and others seeking an injunction on the defendants from selling their property and encroaching on the plaintiff's property. The court examined the application and granted the requested injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from selling their property and encroaching on the plaintiff's property
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an injunction preventing the defendants from selling their property and encroaching on the plaintiff's property until a specific date. Notice was issued to the respondents regarding this decision.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that delaying the notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, necessitating immediate relief.
The court found that delaying the notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, necessitating immediate relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that delaying the notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, necessitating immediate relief.
The court found that delaying the notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, necessitating immediate relief.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondents from selling their property including B schedule property into it and from encroaching and trespassing into the plaint A schedule property until 03/06/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheltan Lopez
- Party Age
- 89
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Margret Anto
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Willson Anto
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kolastika Wilfred
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and supporting documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Thirumala K. Biju kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Smitha Bijukumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Jithin.J. Prakash
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from selling their property and from encroaching into the plaint property.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondents from selling their property including B schedule property into it an from encroaching and trespassing into the plaint A schedule property until 03/06/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the proceedings.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheltan Lopez vs Margret Anto et al regarding injunction against property sale and encroachment
Case Code Year
Case between Sheltan Lopez vs Margret Anto et al regarding injunction against property sale and encroachment