Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1503/2015

Case between Sheela et al vs Ani.K regarding amendment of counter claim

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Code No.
1503
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sheela, Reshma, and Rahul as petitioners seeking to amend a counter claim filed against Ani.K. The court heard both parties on the need for the amendment and granted the request for allowing the amendment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for amending the counter claim, stating it was necessary for a fair adjudication of the case and would not prejudice the counter petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
OS
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for amending the counter claim, stating it was necessary for a fair adjudication of the case and would not prejudice the counter petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The proposed amendment is necessary for the full and fair adjudication of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The proposed amendment is necessary for the full and fair adjudication of the case.
Supporting Evidence
I find that the proposed amendment is necessary for the full and fair adjudication of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Carryout amendment within 14 days.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheela
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o Late Reghu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reshma
Relation
D/o Sheela
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rahul
Relation
S/o Sheela
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ani.K
Relation
S/o. Karunakaran Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kariyam.M.Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.R.Sudheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Amendment of the counter claim allowed.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Carryout amendment within 14 days.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
OS
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs Usha et al regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
OS Plaintiff Won
Case between S. Raman Menon vs B. Meena et al regarding dismissal of suit
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -RCC
OS Defendant Won
Case between Treesa Janet vs Johnson et al regarding dismissal for default.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
OS Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won