Case Summary
This case involves Treesa Janet as the plaintiff and Johnson, Viji, and Sameer Sulaiman as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear despite several opportunities.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
OS
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. The court provided several opportunities for the plaintiff to appear, which were not utilized.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not represent themselves in court despite multiple chances.
The plaintiff did not represent themselves in court despite multiple chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not represent themselves in court despite multiple chances.
The plaintiff did not represent themselves in court despite multiple chances.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defect not cured despite several opportunities given.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Treesa Janet
- Party Age
- 57
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Johnson
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Viji
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sameer Sulaiman
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Ajitha Kumari. S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
OS
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Treesa Janet vs Johnson et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Treesa Janet vs Johnson et al regarding dismissal for default.