Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1742/2025

Case between Saranjith.M. vs Ratheesh Kumar.V., Ajith regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
Case Code No.
1742
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saranjith.M. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against defendants Ratheesh Kumar.V. and Ajith to prevent them from evicting him from a shop room. The court has granted a temporary injunction to maintain the status quo.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from evicting him using force. This is to ensure the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the shop room until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from evicting him using force. This is to ensure the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the shop room until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff made out a prima facie case and the delay in granting an injunction would defeat the purpose of protection.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff made out a prima facie case and the delay in granting an injunction would defeat the purpose of protection.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants, their henchmen, or agents from evicting the plaintiff using force.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saranjith.M.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh Kumar.V.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith
Party Age
32
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Deepu.U.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from evicting the plaintiff using force or threat.
Evidence:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants, their henchmen, or agents from evicting the plaintiff using force or threat from the plaint A schedule shop room other than through due process of law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won