Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1338/2022

Case between Sabimol.S.S vs Pramoda.S.S et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-07-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit where the plaintiff, Sabimol.S.S, was absent and made no representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabimol.S.S
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pramoda.S.S
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu Sreenivasan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Deepak Twinkle Sanal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Sajan.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. DhanyaViswanath.L.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Soumya.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreeja Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made. Suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabimol.S.S vs Pramoda.S.S et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Sabimol.S.S vs Pramoda.S.S et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won