Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.848/2023

Case between S. Nagappan vs Sreekumaran Thambi.G et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
approximately-2 years 23 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, S. Nagappan, a senior citizen and handicapped man, filed a suit against the defendants, Sreekumaran Thambi.G and Balagopal.G.S, for recovery of an advance payment regarding a lease agreement for a building. The defendants failed to execute the lease as agreed and did not return the advance amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover ₹5,55,332 with interest. The defendants are also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹5,55,332 with future interest at the rate of 4% per annum from the date of suit till realization from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover ₹5,55,332 with interest. The defendants are also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the claimed amount due to unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the claimed amount due to unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit. There is no reason to disbelieve PW1. The plaintiff’s evidence remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 5,55,332/- with future interest at the rate of 4% per annum from the date of suit till realiasation from the defendants and their assets. 2.The defendants shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Nagappan
Party Age
68
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumaran Thambi.G
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balagopal. G.S
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Bank Statement
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.D.Lijo Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Alen N. Albin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,55,332 with future interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for realization of 5,55,332/- from the defendants as prayed for.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to support the plaintiff's claim of the amount owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between S. Nagappan vs Sreekumaran Thambi.G et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between S. Nagappan vs Sreekumaran Thambi.G et al regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 02/10/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won