Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1938/2025

Case between R.Ayyamperumal vs Godendaraj et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
Case Code No.
1938
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R.Ayyamperumal is the plaintiff seeking an ad-interim injunction. The defendants, Godendaraj and Kokila, are obstructing the plaintiff's use of the verandah and staircase of the property in question.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from obstructing his use of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstruction.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from obstructing his use of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit. Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counters petitioners from causing obstruction to petitioner...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.Ayyamperumal
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Godendaraj
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kokila
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Praveen Vyasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstruction to the petitioner or persons claiming under him from using the Verandah and from using the staircase to the first floor of the plaint schedule property
Evidence:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counters petitioners from causing obstruction to petitioner or persons claiming under him from using the Verandah and from using the staircase to the first floor of the plaint schedule property until 17/12/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won