OS. No.1658/2022

Case between Rahul Thulaseedharan.T.L vs Viju.S.S et al regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence

Court

COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi.C

Order Date

2025-08-19

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rahul Thulaseedharan.T.L filed a suit against Viju.S.S and others. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear for several hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Final Judgment

The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to repeated absence and lack of representation in court.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear for several hearings leading to dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear for several hearings leading to dismissal of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

As plaintiff was continuously absent no representation was made as side of plaintiff for last several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit stands dismissed

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rahul Thulaseedharan.T.L
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Viju.S.S
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Minimol
Party Age: 38
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Leela.S
Party Age: 62

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sindhu.L
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: V.Sasidharan Nair
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K.Bijulal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. Ajitha V K Nair
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Anil Kumar.V.C.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to non-appearance.

Evidence: