Case Summary
Radhika.B.R. filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against Beena Moli and others. The court has granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing into the property until a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property and committing any act of waste until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into plain A schedule property and from committing any act of waste within the plaint schedule property until 22/10/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhika.B.R.
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena Moli
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remani
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sruthi S.Kumar
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nithin.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sunod.V.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Govind.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Lekshmi Santhosh.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property and committing any act of waste.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into plain A schedule property and from committing any act of waste within the plaint schedule property until 22/10/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit before making its decision.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Radhika.B.R. vs Beena Moli et al regarding an ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Radhika.B.R. vs Beena Moli et al regarding an ad-interim injunction