Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1883/2019

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Balagoapal.S. et al regarding realisation of money

Court
Additional Munsiff-III Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Punjab National Bank, is seeking to recover defaulted education loan amounts from the defendants who failed to repay the loan. The case was heard and a judgment was delivered on 30th June 2025.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed loan amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,37,818.99/- from the defendants and their assets along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed loan amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence as the defendants were ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence as the defendants were ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,37,818.99/- from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Punjab National Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balagoapal.S.
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanil Kumar.S.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suchitra.S.
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Sanction letter, Agreement of term loan for education, Common agreement, Balance and security confirmation, Copy of Advocate Notice, Certified copy of statement of accounts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anithas Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,37,818.99/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,37,818.99/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 13.95% per annum with monthly rests from 01/12/2019 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 13.95% per annum with monthly rests from 01/12/2019 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3. Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
4. Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the initial application for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the approval of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement of term loan for education
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlined the terms and conditions of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Common agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the overall agreement between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Balance and security confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the balance and security related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Balance and security confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further confirms the balance and security related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that prior notice was given to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves communication attempts regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the financial history of the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Balagoapal.S. et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Balagoapal.S. et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 06/30/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won