Case Summary
The petitioner, P.K. Syamala, seeks a temporary injunction against the defendants, Sreelatha @ Molley and Ajaya Kumar.B, to prevent them from demolishing property and interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction granted restraining the defendants from demolishing and interfering with the property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from demolishing any compound walls and interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and allowing the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and allowing the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and allowing the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and allowing the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/ defendants, their agents and henchmen from demolishing any compound walls of the plaint A schedule property...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K. Syamala
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o.late Padmalayan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreelatha @ Molley
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o. Thankamoni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajaya Kumar.B
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kamaleswaram. S. Manikantan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vaisakh.M.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pallichal S. K. Pramod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the counter petitioners from demolishing any compound walls of the plaint A schedule property, trespassing into any portion of the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint A schedule property by the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/ defendants, their agents and henchmen from demolishing any compound walls of the plaint A schedule property, trespassing into any portion of the plaint A schedule property and also interfering with the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint A schedule property by the petitioner/plaintiff in any manner, until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.K. Syamala vs Sreelatha @ Molley et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between P.K. Syamala vs Sreelatha @ Molley et al regarding temporary injunction