Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1702/2018

Case between Padma kumar vs Manju Sajan George regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is a contractor who undertook painting work for the defendant's house. The defendant failed to pay the agreed amount for the completed work, leading to this suit for recovery of dues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs.2,09,892/- with interest. The court found that the defendant failed to pay as per the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled for a realisation of an amount of Rs.2,09,892/- with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs.2,09,892/- with interest. The court found that the defendant failed to pay as per the agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to make payments as per the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant failed to make payments as per the agreement.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore in the conspectus of the aforesaid facts in evidence of record it can be safely inferred that the defendant failed to make payments as per Ext.A1 agreement and therefore plaintiff is entitled to get the relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows 1) The plaintiff is entitled for a realisation of an amount of Rs.2,09,892/- with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padma kumar
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manju Sajan George
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
03.04.2018 Agreement, various Cash/Credit Bills from 14.04.2018 to 22.05.2018, Copy of Advocate Notice dated 21.07.2018, Reply Notice dated 24.07.2018
Defendants Documents
03.04.2018 agreement, Copy of Reply Notice and copy of A/D card dated 24.07.2018

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.G.S.Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Robin Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of the amount owed for the painting works completed.
Evidence:
Therefore in the conspectus of the aforesaid facts in evidence of record it can be safely inferred that the defendant failed to make payments as per Ext.A1 agreement and therefore plaintiff is entitled to get the relief as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the contract entered into between the plaintiff and defendant for painting works.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cash/Credit Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents consist of multiple bills for the purchase of paint and materials required for the painting work.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a legal notice sent to the defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the reply to the advocate notice sent by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of dispatch for the advocate's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the receipt of the advocate's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is the customer copy of the agreement for the painting works.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the reply notice sent by the defendant in response to the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Padma kumar vs Manju Sajan George regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Padma kumar vs Manju Sajan George regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 04/03/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won