Case Summary
Nujuma and Muhammed Shah are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against the defendant, Shibu. K. The court found that granting an injunction is necessary to prevent trespassing into the property in question.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing into the property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing on the property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for injunctive relief.
The plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for injunctive relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nujuma
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shah
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shibu. K
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. J. Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Evidence:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was reviewed as part of the court's consideration for granting the injunction.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaint was part of the documentation perused by the court to assess the case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Oral evidence was discussed by the learned counsel during the hearing.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nujuma vs Shibu. K regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nujuma vs Shibu. K regarding injunction