Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.644/2025

Case between Nithin.V. vs Vasantha Surendran et al regarding injunction against forceful eviction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-04-02
Duration
Case Code No.
644
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nithin.V. is the petitioner seeking an injunction against the defendants, Vasantha Surendran and Subin, to prevent forceful eviction from specific premises. The court has heard the case and has granted an ad-interim injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to protect the petitioner from being forcefully evicted by the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting the petitioner.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to protect the petitioner from being forcefully evicted by the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/ plaintiff has made out a prima facie case...

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from forcefully evicting the petitioner...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nithin.V.
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasantha Surendran
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subin
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kesaveeyam S. Shibukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Roshni Robin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from forcefully evicting the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from forcefully evicting the petitioner from the petition schedule premises or from doing anything harmful to the peaceful possession, conduct and enjoyment of the petition schedule building by the petitioner until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won