Case Summary
Murukan, the plaintiff, seeks an injunction against V.Saravanan, the defendant, regarding a property settlement. The court heard the case and decided in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the plaintiff, preventing the defendant from alienating or encumbering the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case that could be defeated by a delay in granting the injunction.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case that could be defeated by a delay in granting the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-intrim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant from creating any document alienating or encumbering or creating charge over property comprised in settlememt deed No.4430/2004.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Murukan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.Saravanan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, Plaint and other documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dileep Sathyan.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anjali Dileep
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sidharth.S.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sangeetha Savithri
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Riya Liza Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.S.Sheeja
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abhay.S.S.Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Shibi.S.Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vishak.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from creating any document alienating or encumbering the property.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that the object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit submitted by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the plaint in making its decision.
Reference:
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referenced the settlement deed regarding the property in question.
Reference:
No.4430/2004
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025