Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.968/2017

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Geetha et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-12 years 0 days
Case Code No.
968
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd., is seeking recovery of money from the defendants, Geetha and Thomas, for a loan that was defaulted. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to repay the loan of ₹14,202/- along with interest despite being notified.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff and decreed the suit. The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹14,202/- along with interest and costs from the defendants' assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹14,202/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff and decreed the suit. The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹14,202/- along with interest and costs from the defendants' assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants did not contest the claims, leading to the plaintiff's evidence being unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants did not contest the claims, leading to the plaintiff's evidence being unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹14,202/- from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory Note dated 28/09/2013, Agreement of hire purchase dated 28/09/2019, Certified Copy of Statement of Account, Copy of Advocate Notice dated 18/05/2017.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasannakumar Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Renjini.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹14,202/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹14,202/- with interest at the rate of 10.10% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.10% per annum with monthly rests till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.10% per annum with monthly rests till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document serves as evidence of the loan agreement and the borrower's obligation to repay.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Hire Purchase
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms under which the loan was granted for the purchase of a computer.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the outstanding balance and payment history of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants regarding the outstanding loan amount and default.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts serve as proof of sending the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These cards confirm receipt of the advocate notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 09/28/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won