Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.609/2020

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credit Limited vs C.S. Jeevan et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-8 years 7 months
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credit Limited filed a suit against C.S. Jeevan and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The plaintiff alleges non-payment of dues by the defendants despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the owed amount from the first defendant. The suit was decreed for the amount claimed, with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realize ₹73,244/- from the 1st defendant along with interest at the rate of 15% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the owed amount from the first defendant. The suit was decreed for the amount claimed, with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence from the plaintiff established that the defendant owed the amount as claimed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence from the plaintiff established that the defendant owed the amount as claimed.
Supporting Evidence
It is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit. The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the 1st defendant was set ex parte.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Plaintiff is allowed to realise 73,244/- from the 1st defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credit Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.S. Jeevan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathyabhama
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji kumar
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original promissory note dated 27/10/2016, Agreement of hire purchase dated 27/10/2016, Statement of accounts from 27/10/2016 to 25/05/2020, Revival letter dated 27/05/2019, Lawyer’s notice dated 14/05/2020.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jayarekha.G.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramesh kumar.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.73,244/- from the first defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for realization of the plaint amount with interest.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15% per annum with monthly rests till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15% per annum with monthly rests till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the first defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the first defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Hire Purchase
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions of the loan provided to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the payment history of the loan availed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the revival of the agreement and the obligations under it.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a notice sent to the defendants regarding their default.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credit Limited vs C.S. Jeevan et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credit Limited vs C.S. Jeevan et al regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 10/27/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won