Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.954/2024

Case between M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation vs Renji Priya.R et al regarding realization of money.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-18
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months 8 days
Case Code No.
954
Case Closed
Sat, 01/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation sanctioned a loan to Renji Priya.R, guaranteed by Remani.K. The defendants defaulted repayment despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff Rs.1,22,570 with interest. The plaintiff's evidence proved the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are ordered to pay Rs.1,22,570 with interest at the rate of 17% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff Rs.1,22,570 with interest. The plaintiff's evidence proved the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.1,22,570/- (Rupees One lakh Twenty Two thousand Five hundred and Seventy only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 17% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renji Priya.R
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remani.K
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory note dated 10.11.2023, Agreement with loan application form dated 10.11.2023, Copy of statement of account, Copy of lawyer’s notice dated 12.04.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.B.Madhukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Molamma Manuel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajan.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Varun Prathap.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anjali.P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court granted the plaintiff's request for recovery of the loan amount.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.1,22,570/- (Rupees One lakh Twenty Two thousand Five hundred and Seventy only) to the plaintiff

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff used this document to prove the loan amount and terms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement with loan application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the repayment terms accepted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document showed the payment history and outstanding amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants regarding the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the lawyer’s notice was not received by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another returned postal cover showing unsuccessful delivery of correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original power of attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorized the representative to act on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 11/10/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won