Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1730/2022

Case between M/s Dany Martin Associates vs M/s Padippurayil Kitchen Accessories et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Code No.
1730
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Dany Martin Associates, is seeking recovery of a debt amounting to ₹1,03,366/- from the defendants, M/s Padippurayil Kitchen Accessories and K.K. Anil Kumar. The defendants failed to pay despite multiple demands, leading the plaintiff to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹1,03,366/- along with interest from the defendants. The court concluded that the defendants had not presented evidence to contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
₹1,03,366/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹1,03,366/- along with interest from the defendants. The court concluded that the defendants had not presented evidence to contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding the outstanding amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding the outstanding amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,03,366/- (Rupees One Lakh Three Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty-Six Only) is due from the defendants. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendants are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,03,366/- (Rupees One Lakh Three Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty-Six Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Dany Martin Associates
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saji Jose
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Padippurayil Kitchen Accessories
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.K. Anil Kumar
Relation
Managing Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Original ledger account, legal notices.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Nair Ajay Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vishnu. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vaisakh Subodhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Anuradha P. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vishnu Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of an amount of ₹1,03,366/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,03,366/- (Rupees One Lakh Three Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty-Six Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of legal communication regarding the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the reply notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the response of the plaintiff to the defendants' legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the defendants' response to the plaintiff's communication.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the legal demand for payment made to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of receipt of legal notices by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/07/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won