Case Summary
The case involves petitioners Mary John Domenic, A.M.Sunilkumar, V.G.Sheeja, and Laludev seeking a temporary injunction against the defendant T.Leela. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the plaintiffs' property access.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction granted restraining the defendant from trespassing.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioners restricting the defendant's actions that would obstruct the plaintiffs' access to their property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence,temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant and her agents from trespassing causing any obstruction to the ingress and egress of the plaintiff’s through the plaint B schedule pathway and from doing any detrimental acts against the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs,until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary John Domenic
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.M.Sunilkumar
- Party Age
- 61
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.G.Sheeja
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Laludev
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.Leela
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.S.Sukesan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant and her agents from trespassing causing any obstruction to the ingress and egress of the plaintiff’s through the plaint B schedule pathway and from doing any detrimental acts against the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs, until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction. Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant and her agents from trespassing causing any obstruction to the ingress and egress of the plaintiff’s through the plaint B schedule pathway and from doing any detrimental acts against the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs, until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025