Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 500/2025

Case between Manikandan.D vs Mahesh Kumar. C.S et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manikandan.D is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Mahesh Kumar. C.S and Sreerag @ Kannappan, the defendants. The plaintiff claims that granting notice before the injunction would defeat its purpose due to potential delay.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint ‘A’ schedule property and destroying the plaint ‘B’ schedule property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and destroying property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint ‘A’ schedule property and destroying the plaint ‘B’ schedule property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from trespassing into plaint ‘A’ schedule property and from destroying the plaint ‘B’ schedule property until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manikandan.D
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahesh Kumar. C.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreerag @ Kannappan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. J.Koshy Newton
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.P. Vishnu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from trespassing into plaint ‘A’ schedule property and from destroying the plaint ‘B’ schedule property until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manikandan.D vs Mahesh Kumar. C.S et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Manikandan.D vs Mahesh Kumar. C.S et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won