Case Summary
Madhusoodanan Nair is the plaintiff seeking relief against multiple defendants including Syama, Krishnamma, Podiyan, Bindhu, and Gopi. The case involves an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining counter petitioners from causing obstructions to ingress and egress.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's access to his property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
The delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners from causing obstructions to the ingress and egress of the vehicles coming to the plaint A schedule property through plaint B schedule pathway until 06/06/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Madhusoodanan Nair
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syama
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnamma
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Podiyan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindhu
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Arun.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioners from causing obstructions to the ingress and egress of the vehicles.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners from causing obstructions to the ingress and egress of the vehicles coming to the plaint A schedule property through plaint B schedule pathway until 06/06/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025