Case Summary
Lalitha, the plaintiff, failed to appear in court, and there was no representation for her. As a result, the court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lalitha
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sambasivan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sivaprasad K.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suneesh.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lalitha vs Sambasivan regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Lalitha vs Sambasivan regarding dismissal for default