Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.315/2019

Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited is the plaintiff seeking a mandatory injunction for the defendant to vacate property leased for business, while the defendant alleges false claims. The suit arises after the defendant failed to vacate the property despite requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property and pay monthly damages.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and established the entitlement to relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A9 remains unchallenged. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today. 2) Defendant is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per month as damages for the use and occupation of plaint schedule property till he vacates from the property. 3) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.P.Ajayakumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.Abdul Mujeeb
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Nazar.P
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease agreement between plaintiff firm and defendant, lawyer notices, reply notices, postal acknowledgment card and receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Deepu.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.M.Musthafa
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay damages for use and occupation of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per month as damages for the use and occupation of plaint schedule property till he vacates from the property.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lease agreement establishes the terms under which the defendant occupied the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This lawyer notice was issued to the defendant demanding vacant possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice from the defendant's advocate contains the defendant's response to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another lawyer notice issued to the defendant regarding possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another reply notice sent by the defendant’s advocate in response to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of yet another lawyer notice issued to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal acknowledgment card received in relation to the notices sent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt related to the notices sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The resolution from the part-time administration of the bank relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/11/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Hareesh Kumar.T.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won