Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.318/2019

Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Hareesh Kumar.T.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited and Hareesh Kumar.T.P. The plaintiff is seeking a mandatory injunction and damages due to the defendant's failure to vacate leased property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the property and pay damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property and pay Rs.10,000/- per month as damages.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the property and pay damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A9 remains unchallenged. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today. 2) The defendant is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per month as damages for use and occupation of plaint schedule property till he vacates from the property. 3) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited
Relation
Rep by General Manager Incharge.K.P.Ajayakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hareesh Kumar.T.P
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease agreement between plaintiff firm and defendant, Copy of lawyer notice, Reply Notice, Copy of lawyer notice, Copy of Reply notice, Copy of lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Postal acknowledgment Card, Resolution No.3 of part time administration of the Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Deepu.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.M.Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay damages for use and occupation of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per month as damages for use and occupation of plaint schedule property till he vacates from the property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the lease agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The response from the defendant to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The second response from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of another lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment for the postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Resolution No.3 regarding part-time administration of the Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of Possession
Case Code
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Hareesh Kumar.T.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages
Case Code Year
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Hareesh Kumar.T.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/11/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Karnataka Bank Limited vs Ananya.M et al regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S UCO Bank vs Mr. Akhil raj.O et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won