Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sunena.C and others. The plaintiff had no representation and did not state that the matter was settled, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunena.C
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bobby Kettil.C
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambujam.K.K
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Nikhil.T.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anaswara.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Manoj Kumar.M.C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection