Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.236/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Sri.Jiyad Moideen et al regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Meera John.K
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its Senior Manager, while Sri.Jiyad Moideen and Sri.Moideenkutty are the defendants. The case has been settled and the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court noted that the matter is settled and the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit. Therefore, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court noted that the matter is settled and the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit. Therefore, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff settled the matter and chose not to proceed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff settled the matter and chose not to proceed.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff filed statement that matter is settled and hence plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Jiyad Moideen
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Moideenkutty
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.N.Narayanan Kutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Arun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Anjana.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff does not intent to proceed with the suit.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed statement that matter is settled and hence plaintiff does not intent to proceed with the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sri.Jiyad Moideen et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sri.Jiyad Moideen et al regarding civil suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank et al vs Leela.C.K regarding petition for decree transmission.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/S UCO Bank vs Mr. Akhil raj.O et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won