Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 1644/2022

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pratheeksha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
approximately-8 years 3 months
Case Code No.
1644
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Pratheeksha JLG Vizhinjam Unit and other defendants for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants defaulted on repayment despite multiple reminders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount Rs. 1,64,151/- from the defendants jointly and severally.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence prove its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount Rs. 1,64,151/- (Rupees One lakh Sixty Four thousand One hundred and Fifty One only) from the defendants jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 15% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its branch manager Nijin.S.R.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pratheeksha JLG Vizhinjam Unit
Relation
represented by it’s President Jinni.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jinni.S
Party Age
25
Relation
W/o Seeji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha.S.
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o Sasikumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stancy Wilfred
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o Prafin Lopez
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhuyathra
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o Binu
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint Liability Group (JLG) Schemes loan application dated 30.11.2016, Original pronote dated 30.11.2016, Original of take delivery letter to DPN dated 30.11.2016.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Gayathri.R.Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kanjiramattom.T.K.Siraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover an amount of Rs. 1,64,151/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount Rs. 1,64,151/- (Rupees One lakh Sixty Four thousand One hundred and Fifty One only) from the defendants jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 15% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realisation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Liability Group (JLG) Schemes loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the loan application submitted by the defendants for obtaining the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the loan issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original of take delivery letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the delivery of the loan amount to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True extract of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account statement showing the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Inter-Se agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement was executed by the defendants as security for the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Letter of Consent cum Guarantee cum Hypothecation Agreement for JLG loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the defendants' consent and agreement regarding the hypothecation of assets for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original of Acknowledgment of debt and security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the ongoing debt of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was sent to the defendants regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These acknowledgement cards serve as proof of delivery of notices sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9 series
Document Type: Returned Advocate Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These notices were returned indicating that the defendants failed to respond.
Reference:
Ext.A10 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/30/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won