Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.735/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M/s Pooja Vanitha Swayam Sahaya Sangam et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
approximately-5 years 8 months
Case Code No.
735
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, sued for recovery of money after the defendants failed to repay a sanctioned loan. The defendants, a Joint Liability Group, executed several agreements but did not discharge their outstanding liability.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of ₹1,13,617/- with 6% interest and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest and costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided evidence of the loan agreement and the defendants' failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided evidence of the loan agreement and the defendants' failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,13,617/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred and Seventeen Only) is due from the defendants. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendants are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,13,617/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred and Seventeen Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Pooja Vanitha Swayam Sahaya Sangam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rakhi G.A
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biji. A
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha A.G
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Divya G
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 05/10/2015, Original loan sanction communication, Promissory note dated 05/10/2015.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Anithas Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sailaja Kumari. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arun Chandran A.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vijeesh Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,13,617/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,13,617/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred and Seventeen Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as the loan application and forms the basis of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Loan Sanction Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the terms of the loan that were accepted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acts as a promise by the defendants to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence that the defendants accepted the delivery of loan funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Inter Se Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the agreement among the defendants regarding the joint loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of consent cum guarantee cum hypothecation agreement for JLG loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the security for the loans provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the defendants' debt to the plaintiff bank as of 05/06/2018.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the defendants' debt to the plaintiff bank as of 28/05/2021.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the details of the account and outstanding balance due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 10/05/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won