Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.510/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Manju.S et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-9 years 5 months
Case Code No.
510
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, seeks to recover money from the defendants, Manju.S and Vikas.T, who defaulted on a loan for purchasing an autorickshaw. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite multiple notices from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree for the recovery of ₹1,15,753 from the defendants with interest. The defendants did not appear in court and were held liable for the outstanding loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹1,15,753 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until realization, and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree for the recovery of ₹1,15,753 from the defendants with interest. The defendants did not appear in court and were held liable for the outstanding loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated the defendants' liability for the unpaid loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated the defendants' liability for the unpaid loan.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,15,753/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty-Three only) is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,15,753 ₹ /- (Rupees One Lakh Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty-Three Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager, Ramkumar.V.N
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manju.S
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o Vikas.T
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vikas.T
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o Thankappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Application for SRWTO loans dated 24.02.2016, Original Agreement for Vehicle Loans, Original Guarantee Agreement, Bank statement certified for 24.02.2016 to 15.03.2024, Legal Notice dated 19.02.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Reena. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri.V.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,15,753/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,15,753 ₹/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty-Three Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Application for SRWTO loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the loan taken by the 1st defendant from the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Agreement for Vehicle Loans (All Category)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the agreement under which the 1st defendant borrowed money for the purchase of an autorickshaw.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Guarantee agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the 2nd defendant's guarantee for the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Sanction communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Informs the borrower and guarantors about the loan sanction.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains acknowledgments from the borrower and guarantor regarding the loan and their obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A5, Ext.A5(a), Ext.A5(b), Ext.A5(c)
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial transactions and outstanding balance due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the defendants, demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of dispatch for the legal notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Returned unserved postal article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the legal notice was not successfully delivered to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 02/24/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won