Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1044/2015

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arathi N H G et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Arathi N H G and its members for the recovery of a loan amount due to default of repayment. The court heard the case in the absence of defendants, who did not appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹1,33,850/- from the defendants along with interest. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed to realise ₹1,33,850/- with interest from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹1,33,850/- from the defendants along with interest. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged due to defendants being set ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged due to defendants being set ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,33,850/- from the defendants and their assets. 2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from 01/06/2015 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arathi N H G
Relation
represented by its President/Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija.R
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o Raju
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o Anil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jagadamma
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o Saratchandra Bose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beena.S
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o Shaji
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 05.07.2011, Pronote dated 05.07.2011, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security dated 08.11.2013, statement of accounts from 04.07.2011 to 26.05.2015.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S.Reena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Vijayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,33,850/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,33,850/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from 01/06/2015 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from 01/06/2015 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3. Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
4. Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the application submitted by the defendants to avail the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the undertaking by the defendants for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as confirmation that the defendants took delivery of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security of Borrower and Guarantor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the debt and security details of the borrower and guarantor.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed account of the transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arathi N H G et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arathi N H G et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 07/05/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank vs C.Rajasekharan Nair et al regarding realization of money
Court of the Additional Munsiff-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Daglus et al regarding realisation of money.
I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won