Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.83/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Amalarani JLG et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-08-06
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months
Case Closed
Wed, 08/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, represented by its Manager, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, who are members of a Joint Liability Group. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment, prompting the bank to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise 60,435/- from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendants were set ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendants were set ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendants were set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1) Plaintiff is allowed to realise 60,435/- from the defendants and their assets. 2) Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 14.5% per annum with monthly rests from 10/11/2024 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt.Dhanya Arunagireswara Iyer
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijaya.J
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cladis.C
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neethu.E.S
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binushma.C
Party Age
28
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leenamol.B.Y
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 10/02/2017, Letter of consent cum guarantee cum hypothecation agreement for JLG loans dated 10/02/2017, Pronote dated 10/02/2017, Acknowledgment of debt and security dated 27/01/2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Smt. Reena.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri.V.V.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff allowed to realize Rs. 60,435 from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realize 60,435/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 14.5% per annum with monthly rests allowed from a specific past date.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize interest at the rate of 14.5% per annum with monthly rests from 10/11/2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit allowed to be realized from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendants to avail the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of consent cum guarantee cum hypothecation agreement for JLG loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan commitment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledged the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Loan sanction communication to borrowers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication regarding the loan sanction.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document acknowledging the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Verified the amount outstanding as per accounts.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to notify the defendants about the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of mailing documents.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Received confirmation of the delivered documents.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Received confirmation of the delivered documents.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Amalarani JLG et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Amalarani JLG et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 02/10/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won