Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1125/2022

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Biji. M et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
1125
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking recovery of a loan from the defendants, Biji. M and Anandkumar. The defendants have defaulted on repayment despite having taken a loan sanctioned under the Mudra Loan scheme.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹2,30,969 with interest. The plaintiff proved their case through documents and testimony despite the defendants not submitting a written statement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,30,969 with 6% interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹2,30,969 with interest. The plaintiff proved their case through documents and testimony despite the defendants not submitting a written statement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the outstanding loan amount with documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the outstanding loan amount with documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹2,30,969 is due from the defendants. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendants are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,30,969 with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biji. M
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandkumar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 10/12/2015, Original agreement for MSME Working Capital Limits- CC & OD dated 10/12/2015, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 07/11/2018, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 01/11/2021, Copy of the account statement, Request for overdraft facilities dated 10/12/2015, Guarantee agreement dated 10/12/2015, Original promissory note dated 10/12/2015, True copy of the advocate notice dated 08/04/2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gayathri R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kanjiramattom T.K. Siraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court granted recovery of the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,30,969/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Thirty Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Nine Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court granted recovery of the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
(b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the initial loan application made by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original agreement for MSME Working Capital Limits – CC & OD
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement signed for the working capital loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of debt and security of Borrower/Co-obligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the debt and the security agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of debt and security of Borrower/Co-obligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a subsequent acknowledgment of debt executed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the financial standing and outstanding balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document reflects the request made for overdraft facilities under the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the guarantee agreement executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the promissory note signed by the first defendant indicating the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the acceptance of delivery of the loan according to the terms.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: True copy of the advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to defendants regarding their loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These cards were signed by the defendants acknowledging receipt of communications.
Reference:
Ext.A11 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 06/10/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won