Case Summary
Innocent Gomez, the plaintiff, sought a temporary injunction against the defendants, Mary Merina S and D.Renjith, to prevent waste and the demolition of property boundaries. The court granted the injunction on the grounds of a prima facie case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from committing waste and demolishing physical boundaries.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants, preventing them from committing waste or demolishing property boundaries until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the injunction.
A prima facie case is made out and delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants and their men from committing waste in plaint A and B schedule properties and from demolishing physical boundaries adjoining the property situated therein, until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Innocent Gomez
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Merina S
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- D.Renjith
- Relation
- H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.Santhosh Mahadevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from committing waste in plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/ defendants and their men from committing waste in plaint A and B schedule properties and from demolishing physical boundaries adjoining the property situated therein, until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the evidence in support of the petition.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025