Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1015 /2022

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Devendran. K regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 days
Case Code No.
1015
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, Devendran. K, who failed to repay the loan despite reminders. The court found that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,47,991.56 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to establish the defendant's liability for the loan amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to establish the defendant's liability for the loan amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,47,991.56 remains due from the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,47,991.56 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Overseas Bank
Relation
represented by its Senior Manager Anand Raj. B
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devendran. K
Party Age
37
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application, Credit sanction letter, Revised demand promissory note, Letter of undertaking for repayment in installments, Agreement for the term loan and hypothecation, Revival letter, Copy of the statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Koottappu U. Mujeeb
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sureshkumar. P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abin George Mani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding amount along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,47,991.56 ₹ (Rupees One Lakh Forty-Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-One and Fifty-Six paise only) remains due with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referred to the loan application executed by the defendant to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Credit Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the sanction of the loan amount to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Revised Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court marked this document to confirm the defendant's commitment to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking for repayment of installments
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter was referenced to indicate the terms of repayment agreed to by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement for the term loan and hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement was cited to establish the formal terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court discussed this letter as it acknowledges the defendant's liability and request for additional time.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to evidence the outstanding balance owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 01/25/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won