Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1238/2022

Case between India Bank vs Kiran Ajith.A.J et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, India Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, who defaulted on repayment. The case went ex parte as the defendants failed to appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the owed loan amount along with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,82,667/- from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the owed loan amount along with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence from the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendants were set ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence from the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendants were set ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendants owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,82,667/- from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
India Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kiran Ajith.A.J
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith Kumar.G
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachithra.A
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 05/11/2012, Joint and several demand promissory note dated 14/12/2012, Agreement for educational loan dated 14/12/2012, Agreement of guarantee dated 14/12/2012, Acknowledgment of debt-cum-security dated 29/11/2019, Statement of account from 14/12/2012 to 16/08/2022, Legal notice dated 20/05/2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajayakumar.K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover ₹3,82,667/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,82,667/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover interest at the rate of 14.50% per annum.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 14.50% per annum with monthly rests from 16/08/2022 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application dated 05/11/2012 was presented as evidence of the loan taken by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Joint and several demand promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note dated 14/12/2012 was used to establish the defendants' agreement to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for educational loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement for the educational loan dated 14/12/2012 was provided as proof of the loan terms and conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement of guarantee dated 14/12/2012 confirmed the third defendant's guarantee for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt-Cum-Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment dated 29/11/2019 serves as evidence of the debt recognized by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of account from 14/12/2012 to 16/08/2022 was used to show the total amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice dated 20/05/2022 and acknowledgment cards were presented to show attempts to inform the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between India Bank vs Kiran Ajith.A.J et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between India Bank vs Kiran Ajith.A.J et al regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 12/03/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won