Case Summary
The Hill City Garden Resident’s Association filed for an ad-interim injunction against Tony Vincent and Joy.J to prevent them from trespassing on property. The court reviewed the evidence and decided in favor of granting the injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against the defendants
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff association, preventing the defendants from trespassing on the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case presented by the plaintiff.
The court found a prima facie case presented by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case presented by the plaintiff.
The court found a prima facie case presented by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants and their henchmen from trespassing into the petition A and B schedule properties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hill City Garden Resident’s Association
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew Abraham
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tony Vincent
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy.J
- Party Age
- 54
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ravikrishnan.N.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sophia Easo
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioners from trespassing into the properties.
Evidence:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants and their henchmen from trespassing into the petition A and B schedule properties
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was reviewed to determine if the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaint was perused to support the plaintiff's claims in the case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Other Documents
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Additional documents were reviewed, though specifics are not detailed.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025