Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.987/2025

Case between Harilekshmi vs AnilKumar regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration
Case Code No.
987
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Harilekshmi filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against AnilKumar. The injunction aims to prevent the defendant from alienating certain property until further orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining AnilKumar from alienating the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted restraining the defendant from alienating property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining AnilKumar from alienating the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from alienating the plaint A scheduled property to third person, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harilekshmi
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AnilKumar
Party Age
48
Relation
H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.L.Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.S.Sankarankutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction was granted restraining the defendant from alienating the plaint A scheduled property.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from alienating the plaint A scheduled property to third person, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was perused to determine the prima facie case for granting the injunction.
Reference:
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaint was considered in the assessment of the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won