Case Summary
Gopika Ajith is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Nair Sathesh. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear or provide representation, despite having multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopika Ajith
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nair Sathesh
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Lijo Roy.L.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No steps even after repeated opportunities. Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopika Ajith vs Nair Sathesh regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Gopika Ajith vs Nair Sathesh regarding dismissal for default