Case Summary
Girijadevi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against R.Somanath, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over the property and aims to prevent any potential damage or waste.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from committing waste or damage in the plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioner, preventing the defendant from damaging the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case was made out and that a delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
The court found that a prima facie case was made out and that a delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant and their henchmen from committing waste or damage in the plaint A schedule property and from fixing and putting up boundary of a permanent nature in between plaint A and B scheduled properties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Girijadevi
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.Somanath
- Party Age
- 79
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Shajil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from committing waste or damage in the property.
Evidence:
temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant and their henchmen from committing waste or damage in the plaint A schedule property and from fixing and putting up boundary of a permanent nature in between plaint A and B scheduled properties, until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the hearing.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025