Case Summary
Gergone Miranda filed a suit against Joseph Sabin John and Josephine Sabin John. The court ultimately found issues with the court fee and rejected the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to an issue with the balance court fee. This decision culminated in the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected because there was no balance court fee remitted as required.
The plaint was rejected because there was no balance court fee remitted as required.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected because there was no balance court fee remitted as required.
The plaint was rejected because there was no balance court fee remitted as required.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected because there was no balance court fee remitted as required.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected. Pronounced in open court on this the 2nd day of July 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gergone Miranda
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph Sabin John
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Josephine Sabin John
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Jayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.P Deepak
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.P.Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Aswathy M.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bibin V B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anjali. A.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bincy S Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected due to the absence of balance court fee.
Evidence:
No balance court fee seen remitted. Hence plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gergone Miranda vs Joseph Sabin John et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Gergone Miranda vs Joseph Sabin John et al regarding rejection of plaint