Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.135/2025

Case between Dr.Rajeev.T vs Anand Asok et al regarding pathway obstruction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Code No.
135
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Rajeev.T is the plaintiff, claiming that the defendants are obstructing a pathway by constructing a gate. The court finds some merit in the plaintiff's case and temporarily restrains the defendants from obstructing the pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court restrains the defendants from obstructing the plaint 'C' schedule pathway until the next hearing date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are restrained from obstructing the pathway.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court restrains the defendants from obstructing the plaint 'C' schedule pathway until the next hearing date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff's case had some merits.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The said submission shows that the case of the plaintiff has some merits.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the defendants 1 and 2 and their henchmen are restrained from obstructing the use and enjoyment of the plaint ‘C’ schedule pathway by the plaintiff till 07/06/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr.Rajeev.T
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anand Asok
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani Panicker
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinoj Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Shine lal M.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Peter Soloman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from obstructing the use and enjoyment of the plaint 'C' schedule pathway by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
the defendants 1 and 2 and their henchmen are restrained from obstructing the use and enjoyment of the plaint ‘C’ schedule pathway by the plaintiff till 07/06/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won