Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.973/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Santhi.K. regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank initiated a suit against Santhi.K. for the realization of a loan amount due. The defendant failed to appear in court, resulting in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amounts with interest. The defendant did not contest the claims, resulting in a default judgment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹51,272/- and ₹78,317/- from the defendant along with accrued interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amounts with interest. The defendant did not contest the claims, resulting in a default judgment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.
Supporting Evidence
According to PW1, despite their undertaking to repay the loan amount together with interest thereon, the defendant failed to turn up and defaulted in paying the said sum.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹51,272/- from the defendant and her assets and the plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 13.15% per annum with monthly rests from 29/05/2024 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhi.K.
Party Age
46
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopinathan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Agreement Cum Deed of Hypothecation, Common application form cum appraisal report for credit facilities, Agreement of Hypothecation for Agricultural Loans, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹51,272/- from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹ 51,272/- from the defendant and her assets and the plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 13.15% per annum with monthly rests from 29/05/2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹78,317/- from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹ 78,317/- from the defendant and her assets and the plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.15% per annum with monthly rests from 01/04/2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan application submitted by the defendant dated 19/12/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 19/12/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Common application form cum appraisal report for credit facilities for agricultural loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Common application form cum appraisal report for credit facilities for agricultural loan application dated 19/12/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation for Agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement of hypothecation for agricultural loans dated 19/12/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt and security dated 26/12/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account from 19/12/2017 to 28/05/2024.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account from 19/12/2017 to 31/03/2024.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Santhi.K. regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Santhi.K. regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won